Why Spoofing Should Not Be Deregulated and Permitted in Financial Markets: Ethical Concerns

Marcin Marian Krawczyk

Abstract


The article examines spoofing, which is one of the most morally controversial practices in financial markets. In doing so, it undermines the arguments of market practitioners and theoreticians who call for its deregulation and permission in financial trading. In particular, it critically assesses three ethical arguments: the “argument from the interpretive nature of deception,” the “argument from the defensive function of spoofing” and the “argument from the fairer distribution of market power.” All these arguments have significant shortcomings and call into question the legitimacy of proposals to deregulate spoofing and as such are unjustified.


Keywords


ethical consideration of spoofing; financial markets; deception; financial trading

Full Text:

PDF

References


Angel, James J., and Douglas McCabe. “Fairness In Financial Markets: The Case of High Frequency Trading.” Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2013): 585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1559-0.

Angel, James J., and Douglas McCabe. “Insider Trading 2.0? The Ethics of Information Sales.” Journal of Business Ethics 147 (2018): 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3391-4.

Arnold, John D. “Spoofers Keep Markets Honest.” Bloomberg Opinion 23 (2015). https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2015-01-23/high-frequency-trading-spoofers-and-front-running (accessed 22.12.2025).

Boonen, Heleen. “High Frequency Trading, Electronic Frontrunning and Structural Insider Trading Under the EU Market A.” The New York University Journal of Law and Business Online (2017). https://www.nyujlb.org/single-post/2017/11/27/high-frequency-trading-electronic-frontrunning-and-structural-insider-trading-under-the-e (accessed 22.12.2025).

Brogaard, Jonathan. “High Frequency Trading and Its Impact On Market Quality.” Working Paper 2010, no. 66: 1–68. Northwestern University Kellogg School of Management. https://conference.nber.org/confer/2010/MMf10/Brogaard.pdf (accessed 22.12.2025).

Carson, Thomas L. “Second Thoughts About Bluffing.” Business Ethics Quarterly 3, no. 4 (1993): 317–341. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857282.

Carson, Thomas L. Lying and Deception: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press, 2010.

Chisholm, Roderick M., and Thomas D. Feehan, “The Intent To Deceive.” The Journal of Philosophy 74, no. 3 (1977): 143–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025605.

Cooper, Ricky, Michael Davis, and Ben Van Vliet. “The Mysterious Ethics of High-Frequency Trading.” Business Ethics Quarterly 26, no. 1 (2016): 1–22. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/beq.2015.41.

Dalko, Victoria, Bryane Michael, and Michael Wang. “Spoofing: Effective Market Power Building Through Perception Alignment.” Studies in Economics and Finance 37, no. 3 (2020): 497–511. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-09-2019-0346.

Fallis, Don. “What Is Lying?” The Journal of Philosophy 106, no. 1 (2009): 29–56. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil200910612.

Green, Stuart P. “Lying, Misleading, and Falsely Denying: How Moral Concepts Inform the Law of Perjury, Fraud, and False Statements.” Hastings Law Journal 53, no. 1 (2002): 157–212. https://repository.uclawsf.edu/hastings_law_journal/vol53/iss1/2 (accessed 22.12.2025).

Heath, Joseph. “’But Everyone Else Is Doing It’: Competition and Self-Regulation.” Journal of Social Philosophy 49, no. 4 (2018): 516–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12259.

Hersch, Gil. “You Can Bluff But You Should Not Spoof.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 39, no. 2 (2020): 207–224. https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej20207695.

Hirschey, Nicholas. “Do High-Frequency Traders Anticipate Buying and Selling Pressure?” Management Science 67, no. 6 (2021): 3321–3345. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3608.

Kant, Immanuel. Lectures on Ethics. Translated by Louis Infield. Methuen & Co. LTD, 1930.

Khorasanee, Kasim. “Spoof, Bluff, Go For It: A Defence of Spoofing.” Journal of Business Ethics 189 (2024): 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05296-7.

Lee, Eun J., Kyong S. Eom, and Kyung S. Park. “Microstructure-Based Manipulation: Strategic Behavior and Performance of Spoofing Traders.” Journal of Financial Markets 16, no. 2 (2013): 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2012.05.004.

Li, Hao H., and Steve Y. Yang. “Impact of False Information From Spoofing Strategies: An ABM Model of Market Dynamics.” IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering and Economics (CIFEr) (2022): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/CIFEr52523. 2022.9776070.

MacKenzie, Donald. “How Algorithms Interact: Goffman’s ‘Interaction Order’ In Automated Trading.” Theory, Culture & Society 36, no. 2 (2019): 39–59. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0263276419829541.

Mahon, James E. “The Definition of Lying and Deception.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, 2016. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/lying-definition/ (accessed: 22.12.2025).

Mildenberger, Carl D. “What (If Anything) Is Wrong With High Frequency Trading?” Journal of Business Ethics 186 (2023): 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05145-7.

O’Hara, Maureen. “High Frequency Market Microstructure.” Journal of Financial Economics 116, no. 2 (2015): 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.003.

Sağlam, Mehmet. “Order Anticipation Around Predictable Trades.” Financial Management 49, no. 1 (2020): 33–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12255.

Shibles, Warren. “A Revision of the Definition of Lying As an Untruth Told With Intent To Deceive.” Argumentation 2, no. 1 (1988): 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00179144.

Strudler, Alan. “Deception Unraveled.” The Journal of Philosophy 102, no. 9 (2005): 458–473. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3655633.

Yang, Liyan, and Haoxiang Zhu. “Back-Running: Seeking and Hiding Fundamental Information In Order Flows.” The Review of Financial Studies 33, no. 4 (2020): 1484–1533. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz070.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2025.40.123-138
Date of publication: 2025-12-31 22:58:02
Date of submission: 2025-10-06 13:52:37


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Marcin Krawczyk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.