The Loyalty of Evidence in Light of the Romanian and European Doctrine and Case Law

Adrian Stoica

Abstract


This article is a conceptual and scientific study that examines the principle of loyalty in the administration of evidence within civil proceedings. Initially developed in criminal procedural law, the concept is increasingly relevant in civil matters due to the growing complexity and technologization of legal relations. The study identifies loyalty of evidence as a fundamental guarantee of a fair trial, requiring that proofs presented before the court be authentic, reliable, lawfully obtained, and respectful of the parties’ rights. The central thesis is that loyalty of evidence must be balanced against the protection of the right to private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The research aims to highlight the necessity of clear and balanced procedural norms governing admissibility of evidence, particularly where sensitive or confidential data are involved. The originality of the study lies in linking the doctrine of loyalty of evidence in civil proceedings to contemporary challenges in privacy protection and data handling. Its scope is national, with references to European standards. The findings provide cognitive value both for legal science, by clarifying a relatively underexplored principle in civil procedure, and for judicial practice, by suggesting a framework that reconciles fair trial guarantees with the protection of private life.


Keywords


loyalty of evidence; case law; good faith; admissibility of evidence; court; civil proceedings; right to private life

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Badurowicz K., Evidence Taking in Civil Procedure in the Light of the Amendment of the Code of Civil Procedure of 4 July 2019, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2020, vol. 29(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.1.27-46

Beleiu G., Drept civil român, Bucharest 1995.

Ciobanu V.M., Tratat teoretic și practic de procedură civilă, vol. 1, Bucharest 1996.

Ciobanu V.M., Briciu T., Dinu C.C., Drept processual civil, Bucharest 2023.

Deleanu I., Loialitatea în perspectiva noului Cod de procedură civilă, “Revista Dreptul” 2012, vol. 12.

Durac G., [in:] Drept processual civil. Curs universitar, ed. I. Leș, Bucharest 2021.

Guinchard S., Ferrand F., Procédure civile. Droit interne et droit communautaire, Paris 2006.

Hanga V., Adagii juridice latinești, Bucharest 1998.

Ionașcu A., Probele în procesul civil, Bucharest 1969.

Jeuland E., The ‘Right to Proof’ and the ‘Loyalty Principle’: A French Perspective, [in:] Evidence in Contemporary Civil Procedure: Fundamental Issues in a Comparative Perspective, eds. C.H. van Rhee, A. Uzelac, Portland 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685250.005

Leș I., Descoperirea adevărului în cadrul procedurilor judiciare. Cu referire specială la procesul civil, Bucharest 2024.

Mihuleac E., Sistemul probelor în procesul civil, Bucharest 1970.

Nowak M., Electronic Evidence in Civil Proceedings on the Background of Comparative Law, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2024, vol. 33(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.2.223-237

Rouvière F., Proportionnalité et casuistique à travers la procréation post mortem et la preuve déloyale, “Revue trimestrielle de droit civil” 2024, no. 2.

Stoica A., Loialitatea probelor în procesul civil. Garanția respectării dreptului la viață privată, [in:] In Memoriam Ion Deleanu. Magistru al metaforei și ficțiunilor juridice în știința dreptului românesc, eds. G. Buta, I.V. Varga, M. Voicu, Bucharest 2024.

Udroiu M. (ed.), Codul de procedură penală. Comentariu pe articole. Art. 1–603, Bucharest 2023.

Urs I.R., Drept civil. Teoria generală, Bucharest 2015.

Vial G., Lhomond C., Adam P., Le droit à la preuve et le principe de loyauté de la preuve: quelle(s) articulation(s)?, “Revue de droit du travail” 2023, no. 3.

Zidaru L., Pop P., Drept procesual civil, Bucharest 2020.

LEGAL ACTS

Government Emergency Ordinance no. 4/2013 on the amendment of Law no. 76/2012 for the implementation of Law no. 134/2010 on the Civil Procedure Code, as well as for the amendment and completion of certain related normative acts (Official Gazette no. 68 of 31 January 2013).

Law no. 287/2009 on the new Civil Code (Official Gazette no. 505 of 15 July 2011).

Law no. 134/2010 on the new Civil Procedure Code (Official Gazette no. 485 of 15 July 2010; republished Official Gazette no. 365 of 30 May 2012; amended by Law no. 310/2018, Official Gazette no. 1074 of 18 December 2018; republished Official Gazette no. 545 of 3 August 2012).

CASE LAW

Decision no. 2788 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, Civil Section, of 30 May 2001 (Pandectele Române 2002, no. 2, p. 62).

Decision no. 601 of the Sibiu Tribunal, Civil Section, of 21 June 2017 (available at rejust.ro).

Decision no. 39 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, Panel for the resolution of certain questions of law, of 16 September 2024 (Official Gazette of Romania no. 1047 of 18 October 2024).

Judgment of the ECtHR of 12 July 1988, Schenk v. Swiss Confederation, application no. 10862/84.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 27 October 1993, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. Netherlands, application no. 14448/88.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 19 April 1994, Van de Hurk v. Netherlands, application no. 16034/90.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 9 December 1994, Stran and Stratis Andreadis v. Greece, application no. 13427/87.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 22 October 1997, Papageorgiou v. Greece, application no. 24628/94.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 12 February 2004, Perez v. France, application no. 47287/99.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 13 May 2008, N.N. and T.A. v. Belgium, application no. 65097/01.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 5 September 2017, Bărbulescu v. Romania, application no. 61496/08.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.4.211-226
Date of publication: 2025-12-31 17:54:22
Date of submission: 2025-08-19 16:36:50


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Adrian Stoica

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.